US Political Update: More Musk Massacres & Political Suicide
Table of Contents 📖
"Democrats, and this is going to shock a lot of people, I think they know exactly what they're doing. And they know exactly what's going to happen."
Hello Team
🎦 00:00-00:47⏩
- Jonathan welcomes the team to ATP Geopolitics and introduces the video topic: a US political update.
- He notes the rapid and unprecedented rate of change in the US political landscape, describing it as a shift towards autocracy and away from small-c conservatism.
- He suggests the political landscape is being reshaped at an unprecedented rate, leading to a form of growing autocracy.
CPAC and Radical Populism: "I am the Law"
🎦 00:47-02:12⏩
- Jonathan introduces a clip from CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) which he argues is no longer truly conservative.
- He highlights the radical populist sentiment of "ripping up laws, norms, and institutions".
- He references Donald Trump's statement "I am the law" and "I'm the king", linking it to Trump's admiration for autocrats like Kim Jong-un and Putin.
Jack Posobiec at CPAC: Trump as the Embodiment of the Constitution
🎦 02:12-03:12⏩
- Jonathan plays a clip of Jack Posobiec at CPAC, who Jonathan notes is vehemently anti-Ukraine.
- Posobiec's statements are presented as examples of radical rhetoric:
- "Donald Trump is not violating the Constitution."
- "Donald Trump is restoring the American Constitution."
- "Donald Trump is the living embodiment of the American Constitution."
- "Donald Trump is embodying the values of our founding fathers."
- Posobiec claims Trump "picked up the destiny of the American people lying in the gutter" and that "a man who saves his nation violates no law."
Troubling and Cringe-worthy Rhetoric: Trump Above the Law
🎦 03:12-03:42⏩
- Jonathan describes Posobiec's statements as "cringe" and "wholly troubling".
- He reiterates that this rhetoric suggests Trump believes himself to be above the law.
- Jonathan argues that if viewers are conservative and wish to conserve institutions and laws, they should not support this movement, which is characterized as radical populism.
Ripping up USAID: Damage to the Vulnerable
🎦 03:42-04:10⏩
- Jonathan mentions the dismantling of USAID as an example of the government "ripping up things".
- He references a New York Times piece highlighting the negative impact of these actions on vulnerable populations both in the US and globally.
- He expresses concern about the "asymmetry" of a billionaire, the richest and most powerful man, negatively affecting the poorest and most vulnerable.
Unqualified Nominees: "Dingbat" Appointments
🎦 04:10-05:26⏩
- Jonathan discusses a series of what he calls "dingbat nominees" for high-level government positions, highlighting their lack of qualifications and inappropriate backgrounds.
- Examples given include:
- Pete Hegseth (underqualified).
- Tulsi Gabbard (inappropriate as Director of National Intelligence).
- RFK Jr. (vaccine denialist in charge of human health services).
- Pam Bondi.
- A "wrestling woman" in charge of education.
- Kash Patel (in charge of the FBI).
- Dan Bongino (conservative podcaster as Deputy Director of the FBI).
Dan Bongino as Deputy Director of the FBI: "Owning the Libs"
🎦 05:26-07:10⏩
- Jonathan plays a clip announcing Dan Bongino as Deputy Director of the FBI, praising his background (NYPD, Secret Service, podcaster) with apparent sarcasm.
- He then reveals Bongino's actual views through direct quotes, highlighting his extreme partisanship and inflammatory rhetoric.
- Bongino's quotes demonstrate a focus on "owning the libs" and a belief in a "cold civil war", using aggressive and insulting language.
Dan Bongino's Background: Misinformation and Conspiracy Theories
🎦 07:10-07:52⏩
- Jonathan presents further information about Dan Bongino from Andrew McArdo, detailing Bongino's history of spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.
- This includes:
- Being banned from YouTube for COVID-19 misinformation (dismissing masks).
- Promoting unfounded claims of voter fraud in the 2020 US election.
- Downplaying systemic racism in law enforcement.
- Championing the debunked "Spygate" conspiracy theory.
- Jonathan concludes that this is the kind of person now second in charge of the FBI.
Reactions to Bongino's Appointment: "Unqualified Does Not Begin to Describe It"
🎦 07:52-08:40⏩
- Jonathan shares reactions from Shashank Joshi of The Economist and The New York Times to Bongino's appointment.
- Joshi predicts senators will pretend this is a normal appointment.
- The New York Times quote calls Bongino "unqualified", which Jonathan strongly agrees with.
Pam Bondi at CPAC: Further Politicisation of the DOJ
🎦 08:40-09:35⏩
- Jonathan highlights Attorney General Pam Bondi speaking at CPAC, further illustrating the politicisation of supposedly non-partisan roles.
- Brian Rosenwald is quoted as saying this is "absolutely inappropriate" and "the opposite of depoliticising the DOJ."
- Jonathan points out the hypocrisy of Republicans accusing Democrats of weaponising the DOJ while appointing figures like Patel and Bongino.
Politicisation of DOJ: "We're going to come and get you" Type Thing
🎦 09:35-10:02⏩
- Jonathan mentions another individual, "Trend there, or Agua, Transday Agua," who spoke at CPAC, using threatening language like "we're going to come and get you."
- This further emphasises the complete politicisation of the Department of Justice and the hypocrisy of the Republicans.
Elon Musk and Government Control: Taxpayer-Funded Golf Trips
🎦 10:02-10:39⏩
- Jonathan shifts to Elon Musk's growing influence within the government, starting by contrasting it with criticisms of government spending.
- He points out the hypocrisy of budget cuts while Trump has already spent $10.7 million of taxpayer money on golf trips, according to The Independent.
- This figure is likely to be even higher, highlighting government spending on frivolous activities while making cuts elsewhere.
Elon Musk's Email to Federal Employees: "Failure to Respond Will Be Taken as a Resignation"
🎦 10:39-11:34⏩
- Jonathan discusses Elon Musk's unprecedented action of sending an email to all federal employees demanding they report their accomplishments from the previous week.
- The email threatens that failure to respond will be considered resignation.
- Jonathan questions Musk's authority to issue such demands as he is not a government employee.
Reactions to Musk's Email: "Ultimate Dick Boss Move"
🎦 11:34-12:55⏩
- Jonathan shares reactions to Musk's email, highlighting the outrage and absurdity of the situation.
- Mike Rothschild points out Musk's lack of authority.
- Representative Eric Swalwell's sarcastic response: "One fought fascism, Two fought fascism..." and "GFY, Elon Musk."
- Senator Tina Smith calls it the "ultimate dick boss move" and expresses sympathy for the workers.
- She compares it to receiving a demanding email from a bad boss on a Saturday night.
Secret Service Response to Musk's Email: Creative Compliance
🎦 12:55-13:41⏩
- Jonathan describes the creative and strategic response from Secret Service managers to Musk's email.
- To protect sensitive information, agents were advised to respond with generic but technically accurate statements about fulfilling their job descriptions and exceeding expectations.
- This unified response aims to prevent individual targeting for dismissal.
Musk Attacks Reuters and Mainstream Media: "Just Lies"
🎦 13:41-14:52⏩
- Jonathan discusses Elon Musk's attacks on mainstream media, specifically Reuters, dismissing them as "just lies".
- He connects this to Jason Stanley's "How Fascism Works", highlighting the fascist tactic of undermining truth and creating an "epistemic crisis".
- Jonathan argues Musk is contributing to this crisis by discrediting reputable news sources.
Trump's $200 Million Ad Campaign on Fox News: Migrant Message
🎦 14:52-15:51⏩
- Jonathan discusses Trump's administration spending $200 million on an ad campaign on Fox News.
- The ad features Kristy Noem thanking Trump for border security and telling illegal immigrants to "leave now."
- Jonathan questions the effectiveness and purpose of this expensive, targeted ad campaign on Fox News, asking if it's simply a way to funnel money to the network.
Irresponsible Firings and Republican Pushback
🎦 15:51-17:25⏩
- Jonathan discusses the "horror stories" of federal employees being fired and the broader irresponsibility of the Trump administration's actions.
- He notes some Republican pushback against these sackings, quoting Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski.
- Collins expresses concern about the impact on Maine's national parks and biomedical research.
- Murkowski slams Musk's email and defends public servants' hard work and dignity, arguing they deserve respect, not absurd weekend email demands.
Project 2025 and Christian Nationalism: "Suicidal Madness"
🎦 17:25-18:55⏩
- Jonathan introduces "Project 2025", a 900-page handbook outlining Trump's plans, which he characterises as "Christian nationalism".
- He highlights the extreme right-wing authoritarian nature of these plans, including abortion bans and other measures.
- He mentions RFK Jr.'s plan to fire all nutritional scientists at the FDA.
- Andrew Cohen is quoted describing the Republican right's actions as "collective suicidal madness."
Anti-Science Policies: COVID Vaccine Funding Cuts and EV Charger Shutdown
🎦 18:55-20:27⏩
- Jonathan discusses further anti-science policies:
- Cutting federal funding to schools mandating COVID vaccines, suggesting Republicans "literally want your children to die."
- Shutting down 8,000 already paid-for and operational EV chargers at federal facilities, calling it "real government waste" and questioning if it benefits Elon Musk.
Rescinding Insulin Cost Reduction and Tax Cuts for the Rich
🎦 20:27-22:13⏩
- Jonathan discusses the rescinding of Biden's executive order to lower prescription drug costs, leading to increased insulin prices for Medicare and Medicaid recipients.
- He quotes a C-SPAN caller from West Virginia experiencing an insulin price hike.
- He criticizes Trump for being "for Big Pharma" and not caring about the average American.
- He mentions Senate votes where Republicans blocked a bill protecting Medicaid and voted against preventing tax cuts for the wealthy if Medicaid was cut.
Republicans Block Protections for Medicaid, Children's and Maternal Healthcare
🎦 22:13-22:33⏩
- Jonathan highlights that Senate Republicans not only blocked Medicaid protection but also Senator Ossoff's amendments to protect children's and maternal healthcare through Medicaid.
- He calls this "pure evil" and states Republicans are not helping ordinary Americans, only corporations and the top 1%.
Billionaire Tax Giveaway: Republicans Reject Amendments to Limit Tax Cuts for the Wealthy
🎦 22:33-23:28⏩
- Jonathan expresses outrage that this story isn't bigger news, attributing it to the volume of ongoing political events.
- He quotes Chris Murphy describing the Senate debate on Republican "billionaire tax giveaway."
- Republicans rejected amendments to limit tax cuts for those making over $10 million, $100 million, and even $500 million, demonstrating a "billionaire protection scheme".
Conflict of Interest with Elon Musk: "First I'm Hearing About It"
🎦 23:28-24:59⏩
- Jonathan discusses the clear conflict of interest arising from Elon Musk's companies' involvement with federal agencies and government contracts.
- He plays a clip of a reporter questioning Trump about conflicts of interest with Musk, given Doge and SpaceX employees working at the FAA and Department of Defense.
- Trump's dismissive response, "First I'm hearing about it" and claiming Musk said there is no conflict, is mocked by Jonathan as absurd and ignorant.
- He compares it to believing Jeffrey Dahmer if he denied murdering anyone.
Trump's Broken Promises: Inflation, Ukraine War, and Tariffs
🎦 24:59-25:35⏩
- Jonathan highlights Trump's broken promises, including sorting out inflation "on day one" and solving the Ukraine war in "one day."
- He labels these as "lies, lies, lies."
- He mentions Walmart's announcement of expected sales slowdown due to Trump's tariffs and rising inflation, suggesting tariffs are not a good idea.
Economic Impact: Russian Market Up, US Market Concerns, and Egg Prices
🎦 25:35-27:36⏩
- Jonathan notes that while the American marketplace is not looking good, the Russian market is doing well, reacting positively to Trump's pro-Russia stance.
- He revisits the issue of egg prices and J.D. Vance's video complaining about egg price increases under Kamala Harris.
- Jonathan points out Vance was lying about the price in his video and that egg prices have actually risen significantly since then due to bird flu.
- He criticizes the administration for cutting government employees working to combat bird flu, exacerbating the egg price issue.
Trump on Egg Prices: "You'll Figure It Out"
🎦 27:36-28:53⏩
- Jonathan plays a clip of Trump addressing the egg price issue, telling his Secretary to "figure it out" and claiming "we inherited all of the problems."
- Trump then pivots to blaming Democrats for "criminals coming into the country," linking unrelated issues like egg prices and immigration.
- Jonathan mocks this incoherent and blame-shifting rhetoric.
Banning Associated Press: "Gulf of America" and Freedom of Speech
🎦 28:53-29:29⏩
- Jonathan discusses the Trump administration banning the Associated Press from the White House and Air Force One for refusing to use the term "Gulf of America."
- The AP is suing the administration, citing freedom of speech violations.
- Jonathan supports the AP's lawsuit and their fight against this precedent.
Purging Military and DOJ Officials: Preparing for War Crimes?
🎦 29:29-30:45⏩
- Jonathan discusses the mass removal of high-ranking officials from the Department of Defense, including generals, admirals, and military lawyers (JAGs).
- He questions the motive behind this purge, suggesting it could be preparation for committing war crimes or other illegal activities.
- He cites Bill Kristol, who argues the purge is not about merit or reform but about ensuring "personal fealty to Trump" and breaking institutional resistance.
Loyalty Over Merit: "I'd Kill for Trump"
🎦 30:45-31:28⏩
- Jonathan emphasizes that appointments are now based on loyalty to Trump, not merit.
- He uses Kane's appointment as an example, suggesting Kane was chosen because he declared "I love Trump" and "I'd kill for Trump."
- He lists Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, and Dan Bongino as further examples of loyalty-based appointments.
- He concludes that this focus on loyalty over merit is characteristic of fascism and dictatorship.
States' Rights Hypocrisy: Abortion and Conditional Funding
🎦 31:28-32:27⏩
- Jonathan discusses the hypocrisy of the "states' rights" argument, particularly concerning abortion.
- Republicans claim to leave abortion decisions to the states, but then punish states that make decisions they dislike by withholding federal funding.
- He points to California's potential funding cuts as an example, suggesting FEMA funding will be conditional based on political alignment.
- He argues this is another form of autocratic regime, where funding is used as leverage to enforce political will.
Autocratic Statements: "I am the Law," "Long Live the King"
🎦 32:27-32:48⏩
- Jonathan reiterates the autocratic nature of the Trump administration by referencing statements like "I am the law," "I am the constitution," and "Long live the king."
- He highlights Jack Posobiec's "I am the constitution" statement as an example of this dangerous rhetoric.
Elon Musk Censoring Grok AI: Anti-Trump and Anti-Musk Bias Removal
🎦 32:48-34:27⏩
- Jonathan returns to Elon Musk and discusses his censorship of Grok AI on Twitter/X.
- Musk has reportedly altered Grok's algorithm to prevent it from saying anything negative about himself or Donald Trump.
- Previously, Grok would identify Musk and Trump as major disinformation spreaders, but now avoids doing so.
- Jonathan criticizes Musk's "free speech absolutist" claims as hypocritical, given this censorship.
Grok's Algorithm Instructions: "Ignore Sources that Mention Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Spread Misinformation"
🎦 34:27-34:45⏩
- Jonathan reveals that Grok's algorithm has been modified to "ignore all sources that mention Elon Musk, Donald Trump, spread misinformation."
- This explicit instruction further underscores Musk's censorship and manipulation of the AI.
Grok Lists Top Misinformation Accounts Interacting with Musk: Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, and More
🎦 34:45-36:03⏩
- Jonathan shares an analysis where Grok listed the top 100 accounts Elon Musk interacts with that share inaccurate content, and then boiled it down to the top 15.
- He lists several prominent names from this list, including Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Libs of TikTok, Jack Posobiec, and others, all known for spreading misinformation and extreme right-wing views.
Grok's Description of Alex Jones: "Misinformation Potential Elevated"
🎦 36:03-36:18⏩
- Jonathan highlights Grok's own description of Alex Jones as a "conspiracy theorist" known for "spreading false narratives on globalism, vaccines and elections."
- Grok's description concludes that Jones' "reinstatement on X and Musk's engagement elevate his misinformation potential."
- Jonathan finds this "disturbing," highlighting the information bubble Musk inhabits and platforms.
Grok's Lack of Safeguards: Chemical Bomb Instructions
🎦 36:18-36:39⏩
- Jonathan mentions that Grok, unlike other AI systems, lacks safeguards, allowing users to ask it dangerous questions.
- He gives the example of asking Grok how to make a chemical bomb, which it will reportedly provide instructions for, unlike other AIs with safety protocols.
Trumpism as a Cult: Brainwashing Children
🎦 36:39-37:34⏩
- Jonathan raises the question of whether "Trumpism" is a cult.
- He presents a disturbing example of parents seemingly "brainwashing" a small child to prefer Donald Trump over superheroes like Spider-Man and Hulk.
- This is presented as evidence of raising a generation unable to think for themselves, blindly following a "dear leader."
- Jonathan expresses agreement with the assessment that this resembles cult-like behaviour.
Democratic Strategy: "Playing Possum" and Letting Republicans Collapse
🎦 37:34-43:05⏩
- Jonathan discusses the Democratic opposition's strategy.
- He considers the idea that Democrats are "caught napping" and doing nothing to counter Trump, but then presents an alternative theory.
- He introduces James Carville's perspective that Democrats are intentionally "playing possum"—appearing inactive while letting the Trump administration collapse under its own weight.
- Carville argues that Democrats should "hold their fire" and allow the Republicans to self-destruct through unpopular policies and public disapproval.
- He believes the Trump administration is already collapsing in public opinion and that Democrats should wait for the opportune moment to intervene.
Hakeem Jeffries and Democratic Leverage: "Screw You"
🎦 43:05-43:32⏩
- Jonathan elaborates on Carville's strategy, explaining that Democrats are letting the Republicans create chaos and unpopular policies.
- The expectation is that Republicans will eventually need Democratic support (specifically from Hakeem Jeffries, the Minority Speaker in the House) to pass legislation, especially regarding debt extensions and tax cuts.
- At that point, Jeffries and the Democrats will have leverage and can refuse to cooperate, effectively thwarting Republican agendas.
- Jonathan summarises this as a longer-term, quiet strategy to "unseat the Trump regime."
Democrats Know What They Are Doing: A Calculated Strategy?
🎦 43:32-44:11⏩
- Jonathan suggests that, contrary to appearances, Democrats may have a calculated strategy and "know exactly what they're doing" and what is coming.
- He admits he is not usually a fan of Democratic strategies but believes in this instance they might be playing a smart, long game.
- He predicts that Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson will eventually have "no other choice" but to concede, viewing this as a sign of Republican "surrender."
Democrats Playing it Well? Let Republicans Commit "Political Harakiri"
🎦 44:11-45:27⏩
- Jonathan reiterates the idea that Democrats might be "playing this well" by appearing inactive and letting Republicans "commit political harakiri."
- He suggests that occasional Democratic criticisms are just "throwing gasoline on the fire" but the main strategy is to let Republicans create their own downfall.
- The goal is to capitalize on Republican failures in the 2026 midterms, potentially regaining control of the House and Senate, and making Trump a "lame duck president."
Infographic: Categorizing Trump Administration Actions (Jan 20-Feb 12)
🎦 45:27-47:53⏩
- Jonathan introduces an infographic sent by "Benny Pye" that categorizes actions of the Trump administration between January 20th and February 12th.
- The infographic uses overlapping circles to visualize different categories of Trump administration actions:
- Dismantling social protection and rights, enrichment and corruption.
- Aggressive foreign policy and global destabilisation.
- Attacking science, environment, health, arts and education.
- Undermining democratic institutions and rule of law.
- Suppressing dissent and controlling information.
- Jonathan describes the infographic as "fascinating" and a "great way of visualizing everything that's going on," highlighting the "slash and burn" and "complete disruption" approach of the Trump administration.
Meme: "I Found the Immigrant Taking All the American Jobs" (Trump Sacking People)
🎦 47:53-48:15⏩
- Jonathan concludes with a meme joke that he finds "really simple" but "hits really hard."
- The meme plays on the classic right-wing trope of immigrants "taking American jobs."
- The punchline is that Trump himself is "the immigrant" taking jobs, but in this case, by literally "sacking people" and removing Americans from their government positions.
- Jonathan finds this meme a powerful and ironic commentary on the Trump administration's actions.
Wrap up
🎦 48:15-48:15⏩
- Jonathan thanks viewers for watching and says goodbye.