Is US Aid to Ukraine Worth It? Unpicking the Numbers & Ideas
Table of Contents 📖
| Topic ID | Topic Title | Timestamp |
|---|
"The US aid to Ukraine is still probably the most cost-effective investment the US and its strategic partners have recently made in national security, an investment whose benefits will still outweigh its costs."
Hello Team!
Jonathan introduces the topic of whether the money the US is spending on aid to Ukraine is worth it and if it is taking away from other priorities. He acknowledges the different political views of his audience and the importance of having an open discussion.
Return to top⤴️
Understanding the Cost of US Aid to Ukraine
- The headline figures for US aid to Ukraine can be misleading. Much of the money stays in the US economy by going to US defense contractors.
- Aid comes in the form of both old equipment (drawdown) and newly manufactured weapons. Drawdown equipment has already been paid for, so sending it to Ukraine actually saves on storage costs.
- Spending on new equipment stimulates the US economy through the "money multiplier" effect, as defense industry workers spend their wages in their local economies.
- The US also benefits from "sweetener" deals when purchasing equipment or ammunition from other countries to send to Ukraine.
US Spending on Ukraine Aid in Perspective
- US government spending in 2022 was about $6.27 trillion, with national defence accounting for $767 billion (12%).
- The largest line item for Ukraine was $18.6 billion in military assistance since February 2022, about 2.5% of US defence spending.
- The real cost of US national security is even higher when factoring in Veterans Administration costs ($301.4 billion in FY2023).
- The total national security budget is over $1.2 trillion, making Ukraine aid a relatively small portion.
Why US Aid to Ukraine is a Strategic Investment
US aid to Ukraine serves several strategic purposes:
- Avoiding a larger global war by deterring Russian aggression
- Strengthening the US's international position and alliances
- Improving the US's image abroad (Pew Research Center data shows a rebound in US favourability)
- Providing valuable experience in modern warfare and alliance cooperation for the US and NATO
- Imposing costs on Russia that it can ill-afford, weakening a key US adversary
The Opportunity Cost of Not Aiding Ukraine
If the US had not provided robust aid to Ukraine, it likely would have:
- Undermined NATO and confidence in US security guarantees
- Allowed Russia to threaten other countries like the Baltics, Moldova, etc.
- Weakened US alliances in Europe, Asia and the Middle East
- Required the US to spend more on its own defence to compensate for diminished credibility
Looking Ahead - Continuing Aid and Pursuing Peace
- Continued US aid is vital to convincing Russia to accept a peace deal that doesn't overly compromise Ukrainian sovereignty.
- The US must be prepared for the costs of a longer war and Ukraine's post-war recovery.
- However, the military and economic burden on Russia will be far higher, weakening a key US adversary.
- Resolute US support also sends a strong deterrent message to China regarding Taiwan.
Wrap up
Jonathan apologises for the length and any imperfections in the video. He emphasises the importance of looking at the cost-benefit of Ukraine aid with a long-term, strategic perspective rather than just headline dollar figures. He has a backlog of other topics to cover in future videos.
Return to top⤴️